BANNER
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
THE MEDIA FOUND ME DURING #TUPAC TRIALS 😀😃🙂 #DOCUMENTARY I LOST DOLLY PARTON #NOTE
Can you see me now!!!
"Truth be told I was filing cases Seigel Suites and Circle K"
Multi Tasking Filing cases While Doing Homework in Court
#IRONY "And you wonder why I drink"
#PoeticJustice #Movie
Monday, October 19, 2026
Sunday, October 18, 2026
STOP LYING!!! MUSTAPHA GOT CAUGHT IN MY ROOM AT NBA ASW!!! 1995 THE ANNOUNCEMENT HE IS HAVING A BABY WITH DR. KING DAUGHTER
DO YOU KNOW DAWN HENDRICKS???
They lying...
Mustapha got caught in my room...
After I left GARY PAYTON party DRUNK because they put that shit in my drink...
They switched my key
I was NOT in the room with Sean Levert
They put Mustapha in my bed
Final Answer
Saturday, October 17, 2026
I DO MY HOMEWORK EARLY, PLUS I GOT A RESPONSE I GOT A RESPONSE FROM THEIR ATTORNEY SO I MOVED THE FILING DATE UP TO 7 DAYS #PUBLICATION
Final Notice of Intent to File, Settlement Discussions, and Preservation of Evidence
EEOC Charge No. 487-2026-01757
EEOC Charge No. 487-2026-01757
Dear (Lawyer):
FINAL COMMUNICATION DISCLAIMER
Because the notice period and proposed response date have changed, this is my final email to LegalZoom staff, management, and Jeff Stibel concerning these matters. I acknowledge Pablo Orozco’s request that communications about this dispute be directed to him. Accordingly, I will direct any further communications concerning this dispute to Mr. Orozco rather than contacting LegalZoom employees or management individually. This notice documents my current position and the response deadline I have stated; it does not waive any claim or right, and it does not extend or replace any statutory or court-imposed filing deadline.
Please be advised that my initial demand provided a 14-day period to allow LegalZoom and its legal representatives sufficient time to receive, review, and respond to the documents and allegations presented.
On October 17, 2026, after I transmitted my final edited correspondence, I received your email confirming that you and Spencer Fane LLP represent LegalZoom in connection with my allegations. You asked that I refrain from sending further communications to LegalZoom employees and directed that any questions or communications concerning my case be sent to you alone. I acknowledge your representation and will direct further communications concerning this dispute to you.
In light of your response, I am revising my previously stated notice period from 14 days to seven days. My stated final date before proceeding with filing is Thursday, October 22, 2026. This is the deadline I am providing for a response and an opportunity to discuss resolution; it does not waive or extend any applicable statutory or court-imposed deadline.
1. Employment History and April 2026 Termination
I began working for LegalZoom.com, Inc. on January 12, 2026, as an Inside Sales Business Formation Specialist. My employment ended on April 10, 2026. I maintain that the circumstances surrounding my termination warrant further examination, particularly in light of my workplace complaints, request for reasonable accommodation, and concerns about retaliation.
My position is that my performance was among the top five on the floor and that I had not been informed that my employment was at risk. I also maintain that I was told the April 9, 2026 meeting was not a disciplinary hearing. I dispute the characterization of the allegations raised during that meeting and the reasons subsequently relied upon to terminate my employment.
I contend that the sequence of events including my accommodation request and complaints, the April 9 meeting, and my termination the following day warrants examination of the decision-making process, the evidence relied upon, the consistency of policy enforcement, and whether protected activity or disability-related issues played a role. I experienced escalating stress during this period and state that I feared for my safety.
2. Accommodation Request and Protected Complaints
On or about March 5, 2026, I requested a work-from-home accommodation related to a medical condition. I maintain that the request required an individualized assessment of my limitations, the essential functions of my position, and potentially effective accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
I understand LegalZoom’s position that it initiated an interactive process and requested additional medical documentation. I dispute that the process and circumstances surrounding my termination adequately resolved my concerns. The communications, documentation requests, alternatives considered, and decision-making timeline are relevant to determining whether the company met its legal obligations.
I also escalated concerns regarding supervisory conduct, workplace hostility, intimidating interactions, and the handling of my complaints to management, Human Resources, Employee Relations, and executive leadership, including Jeff Stibel. LegalZoom disputes my allegations; I maintain that the relevant events and records warrant review.
3. April 9 Meeting and Disputed Allegations
On April 9, 2026, I participated in a management meeting concerning allegations involving customer calls, workplace conduct, and the recording of a workplace interaction. I dispute significant aspects of the characterization of that meeting and the allegations subsequently relied upon by LegalZoom.
I deny representing myself to customers as an attorney or licensed paralegal. My account is that I explained that I was not a lawyer and was studying paralegal studies. I requested access to the relevant call recordings so that the disputed statements and their context could be evaluated fairly.
On April 10, 2026, I maintain that I sought a formal performance review and an opportunity to discuss my accommodation request, retaliation concerns, wage concerns, and pending administrative matter. My employment was terminated later that day. I request that LegalZoom substantiate its stated reasons with contemporaneous records and preserve the evidence underlying its decision.
4. Prior Employment-Interference Concerns
I have also raised concerns about alleged employment interference extending beyond LegalZoom. In my separate litigation and related written materials in Valentine v. Pippen, Case No. 2024L002166, in Cook County, Illinois, I described an incident involving Dun & Bradstreet in 2016. I contend that I had been offered a salaried position paying $75,000 annually and that the offer was subsequently rescinded after a background screening reportedly flagged defamatory content. I have alleged that the circumstances may have involved third-party interference.
I am concerned about what I perceive as a recurring pattern affecting my employment opportunities and professional reputation. I also contend that Jeff Stibel knew who I was when he recruited me on the occasions relevant to my allegations. I recognize that these assertions involve disputed facts and that any connection between the separate matters must be established through evidence. I am documenting this history as context for my concerns, not representing that allegations in another proceeding are judicial findings against LegalZoom.
I believe the circumstances surrounding my termination warrant scrutiny for potential retaliation or improper motive. I have concerns about connections I perceive between individuals and events described in my separate litigation and the events surrounding my employment. I recognize that motive must be established through evidence.
5. Impact on My Personal and Professional Life
I have endured what I perceive as public ridicule and speculation, and I have experienced difficulty obtaining legal representation. I am concerned about the impact of these circumstances on my reputation and my personal and professional relationships in Nevada.
I have experienced significant mental and emotional distress during this process. I am asking that the dispute be handled professionally through appropriate legal channels, without unnecessary personal exchanges or further escalation. I am documenting the impact on me while distinguishing my concerns and perceptions from matters that must be established through evidence.
6. Supervisors, Potential Witnesses, and Call-Queue Practices
I am identifying individuals who may have relevant information concerning the working environment, supervisory conduct, training, call-queue procedures, compensation practices, and circumstances surrounding my employment and termination.
Supervisors: I identify two supervisors, Shonda and Nathan, whose conduct and management practices may be relevant to my allegations. I contend that the abrasive manner in which I was removed from the workplace caused me fear and heightened stress. I request preservation of relevant communications, management records, and witness accounts concerning the circumstances of my removal and termination.
Former employees: I understand that six former employees may have relevant information. One former employee appeared willing to explain matters but ultimately declined to provide further information. I reserve the right to identify additional witnesses as information becomes available.
Current employees who may have relevant information: Kim C.; Courtney S.; Kadeja C.; Michelle C.; Janet S.; Edwin; Quentin; and Maria. These individuals may have information concerning training, call-queue assignments, compensation practices, workplace conditions, and management procedures. I intend to identify relevant witnesses and pursue any interviews or testimony through lawful channels. Consistent with your request, I will direct witness-related communications to counsel rather than contacting individual LegalZoom employees.
Three call queues and compensation practices: Based on my experience, I believe employees experienced uncertainty concerning assigned duties, how compensation was calculated, and how three call queues operated. I request review of the applicable training materials, queue-assignment procedures, compensation policies, performance metrics, and communications provided to employees.
Training concerning call manipulation: I identify trainer Nathan O. as a person who may have relevant information concerning call-queue practices. My recollection is that Nathan O. discussed call manipulation during training. I request preservation and review of relevant training materials, records, and communications that may clarify what was taught, what the term meant in context, and how the practices were implemented.
I believe multiple employees may have relevant information about these matters. I cannot represent what each person will say or whether all employees will provide the same account. I request that LegalZoom preserve relevant evidence and assess these matters through appropriate records and witness testimony.
7. Preservation of Evidence
Please take reasonable steps to preserve all documents and electronically stored information potentially relevant to this dispute, including:
1. My complete personnel file, performance evaluations, sales data, quality-assurance results, coaching notes, attendance records, disciplinary records, and termination documentation.
2. Call recordings, transcripts, audit results, and the methodology and findings associated with the reported review of 182 calls.
3. Records concerning my accommodation request, including communications with the Leave and Accommodation Team, medical-documentation requests, internal assessments, alternatives considered, and accommodation decisions.
4. Emails, text messages, chat messages, meeting invitations, notes, recordings, and other communications concerning my complaints, accommodation request, performance, or termination.
5. Records of investigations into my workplace complaints, including witness interviews, findings, recommendations, and communications concerning the response.
6. Records identifying individuals who recommended, reviewed, approved, or implemented my termination and the information available to them at the time.
7. Relevant policies, training materials, call-queue procedures, compensation practices, and records concerning how those practices were communicated to employees.
8. Relevant communications concerning references to my personal activities or outside materials that were considered in connection with my employment or any investigation.
Please suspend routine deletion or destruction of potentially relevant materials and take reasonable steps to preserve them while this dispute remains pending. This request does not seek privileged material or information outside the permissible scope of the dispute.
8. Claims and Administrative Proceedings
My EEOC Charge No. 487-2026-01757 concerns allegations of disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, retaliation, race discrimination, sex discrimination, and workplace harassment. The relevant federal provisions include the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112 and § 12203(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) and § 2000e-3(a).
The EEOC issued a Notice of Right to Sue dated August 11, 2026. The notice was an administrative step and was not a judicial determination that either party’s factual account was correct. I reserve all rights available under applicable law, subject to relevant filing requirements and deadlines.
9. Settlement Request and Response Deadline
I seek a good-faith resolution of this dispute. My settlement demand is $5,000,000, subject to negotiation and a mutually acceptable written settlement agreement. Any agreement should define the claims being released, payment terms, and any other negotiated terms. No settlement or release will be effective unless documented in a written agreement signed by the parties.
Please provide a substantive written response by October 22, 2026, indicating whether LegalZoom is willing to engage in good-faith settlement discussions. If LegalZoom disputes my position, I remain willing to consider a written counterproposal.
The October 22 date is my proposed response deadline, not a representation that the date is imposed by a court or changes a statutory filing period. Settlement discussions should not be treated as extending any filing deadline unless a legally effective agreement provides otherwise. I will take the appropriate filing steps if the matter remains unresolved, subject to applicable procedural requirements and deadlines.
Closing
I previously raised workplace concerns because I believed they warranted attention. I sought an accommodation, reported concerns about workplace conduct, and requested that disputed allegations be evaluated fairly. I maintain that the circumstances culminating in my termination deserve a complete and impartial review.
Please direct all further communications concerning this dispute to me through the contact information below. Nothing in this letter waives any claim, remedy, or procedural right. All rights are expressly reserved.
EXTRA!!! EXTRA!!! VALENTINE VS PIPPEN CHANGED JURISDICTIONS!!! THIS IS CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
I ADDED GABROY NAME TO GET YOUR ATTENTION
#GABROY IS A WRONGFUL DEATH LAWYER
Cook County Court
IV. SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OF DEFENDANTS’ MISCONDUCT
Plaintiff now presents representative examples of the deliberate and repeated pattern of retaliatory conduct perpetrated by Defendants:
A. Employment Interference
26. Dun & Bradstreet (2016): Plaintiff was offered a salaried position paying $75,000 per
year. The offer was rescinded without explanation after a background screening flagged
defamatory content. Plaintiff later learned this interference stemmed from a third-party
smear campaign instigated by individuals tied to Defendants.
FACT: DEVONTE PIPPEN WAS SHOT!!! THE DAY KOBE WAS SCHEDULED TO SIGN HIS DIVORCE
JANUARY 19, 2012
KOBE JUST FUCKED MY HEAD UP
"HE" WHISPERED...
"IF I WAS ALIVE YOU WOULD OWN THIS COMPANY" #MOMENT
"EVEN AI KNEW MY JERSEY #24 DAMN"
VANESSA IS 8
CHEVY IS 24
Is there a statue of limitation for "murder"?Urgent Request for Pro Bono Representation – 30+ Years of Domestic Violence, Stalking, Harassment, and Attempted Murder (Repost 8/22/26)
Dear Attorney’s,
I am urgently seeking pro bono legal representation in a matter involving more than 30 years of domestic violence, stalking, harassment, and repeated attempts to cause me and my family harm. Since 1987, NBA player Scottie Pippen has stalked, harassed, and terrorized me and my children, escalating across states and jurisdictions. This abuse has continued from Chicago to California to Los Angeles and now into Nevada.
This case involves not only Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), harassment, and domestic violence, but also the wrongful death of Devonte Pippen and an attempted murder against me, Chyvette Valentine. These acts are not isolated—they are part of a calculated, decades-long pattern of intimidation, surveillance, and violence designed to silence me.
🔹 Murder of Devonte Pippen:
Saying Goodbye – Murder of Devonte Pippen (1.20.2012 at 3:30 am)
Watch Here
The abuse has been persistent and organized, involving not only Scottie Pippen but also several high-profile NBA players, including and not limited to Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, and Kobe Bryant. Their involvement underscores the depth, influence, and reach of the harassment campaign against me.
For more than three decades, I have endured domestic violence, defamation, economic interference, housing instability, and continuous stalking, while courts in Illinois dismissed or ignored my claims. The escalation to murder and attempted murder demonstrates the severity and urgency of this situation.
🔹 Media Exploitation of My Image Without Consent:
-
Wendy Williams Show Season 10 Finale – Scottie Pippen Mistress
Watch Here -
Scottie Pippen’s 8 Kids & Messy Dating History
Watch Here
These broadcasts further exploited my image without my consent, compounding my emotional distress and leading to harassment and wrongful job termination.
I am seeking counsel who can:
-
Pursue civil claims in Clark County, Nevada for wrongful death, attempted murder, IIED, stalking, harassment, and related damages.
-
Address the cross-state nature of these crimes and coordinate with authorities for potential criminal referrals.
-
Advocate for my immediate safety and ensure accountability for decades of unchecked abuse.
I can provide extensive documentation, timelines, Cook County court records, and evidence directly linking these individuals to the ongoing harassment and violence. Please also Google “Chyvette Pippen” for further public information regarding this matter.
I am asking for your assistance on a pro bono basis because this campaign of abuse has left me financially drained, emotionally traumatized, and fighting for my survival. Time is critical, and I urgently need counsel who can help me pursue justice.
Please let me know if your firm can assist and how soon we may schedule a consultation.
No, there is generally no statute of limitation for murder under federal law or in most U.S. states, meaning a murder charge can be filed at any time after the crime. This exception exists due to the extreme severity of the crime, allowing for prosecution of "cold cases" with the aid of advancements in DNA technology. However, other serious crimes, like manslaughter or attempted murder, may have specific time limits.
Dear Scottie,
How much did it cost you to hire an attorney—particularly one who never filed an appearance, responded 105 days late, and was not properly on record? Given the clear mishandling of this matter, I am making one final attempt to settle before you further embarrass yourself in court.
Plaintiff seeks the following damages, commensurate with each Defendant’s conduct:
Scottie Pippen – $150 million (rape, stalking, defamation, wrongful death conspiracy).
Larsa Pippen – $125 million (smear campaigns, housing interference, funding retaliation, collusion and conspiracy to commit murder).
Carl T. Pippen – $750,000 (rape, threats, intimidation, harassment).
Melissa Pippen – $250,000 (email-based harassment, aiding interference).
Jason B. Giller – $24 million (concealment, abuse of legal authority, obstruction of justice).
I am uncertain why you continue to pursue this matter while forcing a false narrative that has no basis. You have seven (7) days to find a way to make this right, accept responsibility, and account for:
My assault,
The murder of my son, and
The ongoing harassment, stalking, and interference, which carries the potential for a fatal escalation.
Your conduct has already caused substantial financial and emotional damage, including delaying my European Book Tour and professional obligations.
This is your final opportunity to resolve matters voluntarily before Plaintiff proceeds to enforce judgment and seek all available remedies in law and equity.
Friday, October 16, 2026
DO YOU KNOW SOME PEOPLE ONLY SEE BLACKS AS SLAVES??? GOD FORBID BEING AN EDUCATED NEGRO!!!
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN TO YOUR CHILDREN THE WORD #NIGGER??? I'LL WAIT
WAKE UP, PEOPLE! IT’S 2026!
“I AM NOT YOUR SLAVE!”
Wake up, people! It is 2026!
Let me say this loud enough for everyone in the back to hear: I AM NOT YOUR SLAVE!
I am not here to be controlled, manipulated, intimidated, exploited, or silenced to make someone else comfortable. I am not obligated to sacrifice my peace, dignity, freedom, or well-being because someone believes they are entitled to my time, energy, labor, or story.
My kindness is not weakness. My patience is not permission. My silence is not submission. And my willingness to help you does not mean you own me!
AMERICA: THE COUNTRY I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN
It never ceases to amaze me how people from other countries move to America, the country I was born and raised in, having watched television portrayals and heard stories about Black people in America, only to arrive and discover that the reality of this country is far more complicated than what they imagined.
Some people develop their perceptions of America through television, entertainment, social media, and secondhand accounts. They arrive with expectations about what America will offer them, what opportunities they will find, and how their lives will change.
But America is not a television show. It is not a fantasy. And it is certainly not a country where opportunity comes without challenges, sacrifice, or responsibility.
I was born and raised here. I have my own perspective on this country, its history, its struggles, and the future we are building.
So I have a question: How did we get to a point where the voices and economic concerns of Americans who were born and raised here can feel overlooked in conversations about America's future?
Black Americans have spent generations fighting for equal opportunity, fair treatment, economic independence, and the ability to build wealth in a country we helped build.
We have watched opportunities open for some while others continue fighting for access to affordable housing, quality education, fair employment, and economic stability.
Now, as America continues to change, we must be willing to ask difficult questions about who is shaping the future and whose interests are being prioritized.
YOU CAME FOR THE AMERICAN DREAM. WHAT ABOUT OUR DREAMS?
Some people arrive in America with enormous expectations, believing that simply being here will guarantee them a better life. Others arrive prepared to work, contribute, build businesses, and become part of their communities.
Those experiences are not the same, and we should not pretend that every immigrant shares the same attitude or intentions.
But I am tired of conversations about America's future that fail to give adequate attention to the Americans who are already struggling to survive in their own communities.
What about the American worker trying to make ends meet?
What about the single parent working multiple jobs?
What about the Black entrepreneur trying to secure funding?
What about the American family being priced out of housing?
What about the people who have worked for decades and still struggle to achieve financial security?
When are we going to have an honest conversation about their future, too?
I do not believe that caring about Americans means we must hate immigrants. I believe that our government has a responsibility to consider the well-being of its residents, enforce fair policies, and ensure that economic opportunity is not reserved for a privileged few.
We can welcome opportunity while demanding accountability.
We can discuss immigration while respecting human dignity.
And we can insist that American communities receive meaningful investment without pretending that every newcomer is the problem.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THOSE AMERICAN DOLLARS!
Now, let's talk economics.
We need tax revenue to support public services, maintain infrastructure, fund essential programs, and sustain the communities in which we live.
We need American businesses to thrive. We need local spending, entrepreneurship, investment, job creation, and economic activity that helps working families build a future.
My concern arises when money earned in the United States is sent abroad rather than spent or reinvested in American communities.
People send money to their families in other countries for many reasons. These transfers, commonly called remittances, can support relatives and contribute to economic activity in their countries of origin.
However, we should also be discussing how to encourage more investment in American communities, strengthen domestic businesses, and ensure that the people working and paying taxes here have a fair opportunity to benefit from a healthy economy.
The question is not whether people should be allowed to support their families abroad. The question is how America can strengthen its own economic foundation while remaining part of a global economy.
Money spent at a local restaurant can support employees. Money invested in an American business can create jobs. Money used to purchase goods and services can help other businesses remain open.
Money sent abroad does not automatically represent an equivalent loss to the American economy, and immigrants also contribute through taxes, consumer spending, employment, and entrepreneurship. But the broader question of domestic investment and economic priorities deserves serious discussion.
If we are going to build a stronger America, we need policies that encourage productive investment, reward work, support small businesses, and create opportunities for the next generation.
We cannot continually discuss the American Dream without asking whether that dream remains attainable for the people working hard to achieve it.
WHO IS CHANGING THE BLUEPRINT OF OUR FUTURE?
The blueprint of America's future is changing. Demographics are changing. Industries are changing. The economy is changing. And the decisions made today will affect generations to come.
So I want to know: Are the interests of working-class Americans being adequately represented?
Are we creating enough opportunities for American entrepreneurs?
Are we making housing affordable?
Are we protecting fair employment practices?
Are our tax dollars being spent responsibly?
Are we building communities where people can thrive rather than merely survive?
These questions should not be dismissed as controversial simply because they require uncomfortable conversations.
Americans have the right to question public policy. We have the right to expect accountability from elected officials and institutions. We have the right to demand that economic decisions serve the public interest.
And we have the right to expect that the voices of Black Americans, whose history in this country includes generations of struggle for equal rights and economic opportunity, will not be pushed aside.
We should not have to compete for the right to have our concerns heard.
STOP CONFUSING ACCESS WITH AUTHORITY.
Just because I answered your phone call does not mean you can call me whenever you please.
Just because I responded to an email does not mean you can continue contacting me indefinitely.
Just because I offered assistance does not mean I am obligated to solve every problem you create.
Just because I shared my story does not mean you have permission to exploit it.
And just because I gave you an opportunity does not mean you are entitled to my continued participation.
Access is not ownership. Kindness is not consent. And silence is not an agreement.
These principles apply in our personal relationships, our workplaces, our businesses, and our society.
No position, nationality, financial status, or level of influence gives anyone the right to treat another person as inferior.
I WILL NO LONGER APOLOGIZE FOR KNOWING MY WORTH.
I have lived long enough to understand that protecting your peace sometimes means disappointing people who benefited from your lack of boundaries.
I am allowed to change my mind.
I am allowed to say no.
I am allowed to question decisions that affect my future.
I am allowed to speak about the country in which I was born and raised.
And I am allowed to demand accountability without being expected to remain silent for someone else's comfort.
I can be compassionate without being controlled. I can be generous without being exploited. I can be professional without accepting disrespect.
And I can care about the future of America while insisting that the people who call this country home deserve a fair opportunity to succeed.
MY FINAL MESSAGE: WAKE UP, PEOPLE!
It is 2026!
We need meaningful conversations about immigration, economic responsibility, domestic investment, fair employment, and the future of American communities.
We need leaders who understand that economic growth should create opportunities for ordinary people, not simply increase the advantages of those who already have them.
We need communities where people can work, build businesses, raise families, and live with dignity.
And we need to stop acting as though speaking up for yourself is an offense.
I am Chyvette A. Valentine. I have my own voice, my own mind, my own ambitions, and my own boundaries.
I will collaborate with people who respect me. I will support people who appreciate me. I will conduct business with people who understand professionalism and accountability.
But I will not surrender my dignity to satisfy someone's ego.
I will not apologize for asking questions about the country I call home.
And I will not be silenced simply because my perspective makes someone uncomfortable.
I AM NOT YOUR SLAVE. I AM NOT YOUR PROPERTY. AND I AM NOT HERE TO BE CONTROLLED.
America's future deserves honest debate. American workers deserve fair opportunities. Black American voices deserve to be heard. And every human being deserves dignity and respect.
Wake up, people. The year is 2026.
Respect people. Honor boundaries. Hold leadership accountable. Invest in our communities. And stop confusing the freedom to participate in America with the right to control someone else.
You can stand beside me, work with me, build with me, and grow with me.
BUT YOU WILL NEVER OWN ME.
Chevy
#WakeUpPeople #Its2026 #IAmNotYourSlave #BlackAmericanVoices #AmericanDream #EconomicAccountability #SupportAmericanBusinesses #InvestInOurCommunities #RespectBoundaries #KnowYourWorth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
