Saturday, June 21, 2025
PREPARING AN APPEAL!!!
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISCOUNTY DEPARTMENT – LAW DIVISION
CHYVETTE A. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SCOTTIE PIPPEN, LARSA PIPPEN, CARL T. PIPPEN, MELISSA PIPPEN, JASON GILLER, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Case No.: 2024L002166
Calendar: Judge Maire Aileen Dempsey
Courtroom: 2209
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Plaintiff-Appellant, CHYVETTE A. VALENTINE, hereby appeals to the Illinois Appellate Court, First Judicial District, from the Dismissal for Want of Prosecution (DWP) entered on May 2, 2025, by Judge Kathy M. Flanagan, who was not the assigned judge of record. This appeal arises from a series of judicial and procedural irregularities that deprived Plaintiff of due process and lawful adjudication, including:
Dismissal without notice or motion from Defendants;
No attorney of record for any Defendant at the time of dismissal;
Improper judicial interference by a judge not assigned to the case;
Pending Motion for Default Judgment and Prove-Up of Damages, set for May 22, 2025;
Retaliatory order striking future court dates on June 16, 2025;
Improper ex parte actions and courtroom threats documented by Plaintiff.
This appeal is filed pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rules 301 and 303(a).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL POSTURE
Plaintiff served Scottie Pippen via the Los Angeles County Sheriff on December 18, 2024.
Jason Giller, registered agent for Scottie and Larsa Pippen, acknowledged receipt by email on October 13, 2024, confirming actual notice.
Plaintiff maintained active communication with multiple members of the Pippen family, including Larsa Youkhana Pippen, indicating knowledge and avoidance by Defendants.
Despite these facts, no appearance or answer was filed by any Defendant within 30 days, as required by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 181(a).
Plaintiff filed Proof of Service on April 4, 2025 but was unable to communicate with the clerk or judge due to lack of access to court email systems.
Plaintiff acknowledges that a military affidavit under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. § 3931) was not yet filed, and intends to file it forthwith.
On May 2, 2025, Judge Kathy M. Flanagan dismissed the matter without assignment, notice, or hearing—despite no appearance by Defendants or formal representation.
On June 16, 2025, Judge Flanagan entered a retaliatory order striking all future court appearances.
Meanwhile, Plaintiff had filed:
An Amended Emergency Motion to Vacate the DWP, based on lack of notice, no Defendant appearance, absence of counsel, and threats made in open court;
An Amended Motion to Increase Damages to $350 Million, reflecting new acts of economic sabotage, stalking, utility disconnection, and employment termination, all occurring on May 15, 2025, the same day Plaintiff was originally scheduled for default prove-up.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
A. Entry of Default Was Procedurally Proper
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(d) and Illinois Supreme Court Rule 181, default is proper where no appearance or answer is filed within 30 days.
In Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, 226 Ill. 2d 334 (2007),** the Illinois Supreme Court held that all well-pleaded allegations are deemed admitted upon default.
In Bank of New York Mellon v. Karbowski, 2014 IL App (1st) 130112, the Appellate Court affirmed default and vacated trial court dismissal when procedural rules were followed by the plaintiff.
B. Judge Flanagan Lacked Jurisdiction to Enter Dismissal
Per People ex rel. Reid v. Adkins, 48 Ill. App. 3d 598 (1st Dist. 1977), judges are without authority to issue dispositive rulings outside their assignment.
Plaintiff’s case was assigned to Judge Maire A. Dempsey, not Judge Flanagan.
The May 2, 2025 DWP order was therefore entered ultra vires—without lawful jurisdiction—and is void ab initio.
Entry of judgment or dismissal without notice or a hearing violates constitutional due process under U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Ill. Const. art. I, § 2.
C. Plaintiff Was Entitled to a Hearing on Damages
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-604, plaintiffs are entitled to prove-up hearings following default.
In Collins v. Roseland Comm. Hospital, 2017 IL App (1st) 160559, the court held a trial judge must allow evidence of damages before dismissing a pending motion.
D. Amended Emergency Motion to Vacate Was Timely and Legally Sound
The Amended Emergency Motion to Vacate properly identified procedural errors and threats in court.
The motion was supported by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 2-1301(e) allowing courts to vacate dismissals to promote justice.
Plaintiff was never served with notice of the May 2 hearing and was actively pursuing her motion for default at the time.
E. Amended Motion to Increase Damages Was Based on New, Material Harm
Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Increase Damages to $350 Million was supported by:
Termination of employment;
Disconnection of utilities;
New threats and intimidation;
Continued harassment consistent with the conduct pled in the Complaint;
The pattern satisfies standards for punitive damages under Illinois law, where malicious conduct is ongoing and intentional.
See Bryson v. News Am. Publs., Inc., 174 Ill. 2d 77 (1996) (defamation per se and reputational harm), and Fellhauer v. City of Geneva, 142 Ill. 2d 495 (1991) (economic interference).
RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiff-Appellant respectfully prays that the Illinois Appellate Court, First District:
Reverse the May 2, 2025 Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, and the June 16, 2025 retaliatory order;
Remand to the trial court with instructions to reinstate the Complaint and hear the Motion for Default Judgment with Prove-Up of Damages;
Declare the DWP void ab initio for lack of judicial authority and procedural error;
Grant Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Increase Damages to $350 Million, or remand for a full hearing;
Refer Judge Flanagan’s actions to the Judicial Inquiry Board pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 63 (Canon 3);
Grant any other relief deemed just, equitable, and necessary.
#NCAA #WOMEN #ABC 1995 I met #DawnS & #LisaL in Phoenix
Year I got pregnant 🤰 with #Deja
#MyNBAGodChildren
(Repost from 3/23/2025)
CODES ARE THE SAME, MY CODES ARE UNIVERSAL
Breaking the Player Codes, keys to my car!
1 I am number one in your life
2 Second Wife to somebody??
3 You see or hear GOD
4 I am “HIV” negative
5 Someone with “HIV” near me
6 Dr. J and/or LeBron James
7 Carmelo Anthony (Vegas)
8 (Vanessa) 24 (Chevy) Kobe Codes
9 I am not having a “baby”
10 Perfect Me
11 Who wants to RAPE… yeah
12 Jesus had Disciples how many?
13 Esther (Bible)
16 Pope Francis
18 RIP DJ
20 Gary Payton
21 Weed/Marijuana (y’all so LOUD)
22 Both on a second marriage
23 Michael Jordan
25 Derrek Lee (Cubs)
31 Chris Brown
33 Scottie Pippen
34 Walter Payton
35 Kevin Durant
36 Bishop Don Juan
40 Presidential Codes
42 Floyd Mayweather
45 What gun do I carry?
45 Donald J. Trump
50 I am going off about something, not the rapper jerk #FAKE
52 Supreme Captain Mustapha Farrakhan
58 Judge Zagel (RIP)
65 Dr Dre
66 GB2G aka George Bush:)
68 Year I was born
69 Commander Brian Thompson aka “Silver Fox” (Rahm)
87 Dee
93 DJ (RIP)
95 Deja
97 Hootie
99 JAY-Z
00 Diddy
106 Park it right here (My birthday)
168 Debbie LUCKY lottery number
The Plaintiff in the case of Valentine v. NBA, Chicago Bulls, Scottie Pippen, Carl Pippen, Larsa Pippen et al., Case No. 2024L002166 has filed a Motion in Opposition to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This motion, along with supporting documents, is scheduled for presentment on August 15, 2024, at 10:00 AM.
The Plaintiff, a paralegal student and not a licensed attorney, has made every effort to adhere to court rules and procedures. The complete file relevant to this motion has been submitted, which includes:
- Motion in Opposition to Dismiss
- Supporting Documents: Four (or five) emails pertinent to the case.
- Videos:
- Wendy Williams Video
- Scottie Pippen Messy Dating (highlighting the Plaintiff as Scottie Pippen’s first girlfriend during his tenure with the Bulls)
- Sharon Tharpe Testimony (personal testimony about the Plaintiff’s background and history with Scottie Pippen, distinguishing him from his brother)
One outstanding file is pending, which will be sent at a later date. The court will have access to this file as soon as it is available, if not before the hearing.
Included in this correspondence are legal representatives who have been regularly updated since the initial claim was filed on July 19, 2019:
- F. Sperling (Counsel for Michael Jordan)
- Jason Giller (Counsel for Scottie Pippen)
- William Biggs (Counsel for Earvin "Magic" Johnson/Taylor Swift)
These attorneys are involved due to their connection with the ongoing matter and have been kept informed of all developments.
Please use your access to find attachments to this claim, they are filed on record.
1 | LEAD DOCUMENT |
2 | Tucson Mayor Jonathan Rothschild email |
3 | Las Vegas Mayor Carol Goodman email |
4 | Santa Monica Gary Rhodes email |
5 | VAWA Davis |
6 | VAWA CHA |
7 | Arkansas Child Support Record 1 |
8 | Arkansas Child Support Record 2 |
9 | Arkansa Child Support Payment Ledger Illinois |
10 | Valentine vs Congressman Davis |
11 | Valentine vs Magic Johnson |
12 | Valentine vs Magic Johnson Quash |
13 | Valentine vs Curtis Jackson |
14 | Curtis Jackson Police Report |
15 | threat from Anthony Wilson |
26 | Valentine vs CHA |
16 | Valentine vs McCoy |
17 | Valentine vs Washington |
18 | Farzam TPO response for Pippen |
19 | Valentine vs Brown Discovery |
20 | Service to NBA Executive Office Adam Silver |
21 | Service to NBA Executive Office Pippen |
22 | Service to Michael Jordan |
23 | Email to William Cook reporting Stalking June 16, 24 |
24 | Letter regarding Zagel |
25 | 20 Photos sent via email unable to scan into record |
27 | Gloria Allred email for service |
28 | Pippen cancel police report |
29 | Death threats and stalking anthony |
30 | Appeal 1-23-0271 |
31 | Appeal 1-23-1445 |
32 | Valentine vs Waterton Residential |
33 | Wendy Williams Slander #Larsa Pippen |
34 | Media Valentine vs Pippen 2019 Messy Dating |
35 | 2010 Claim matter was never heard, can't find |
36 | 1994 Pippen Gun Charge, one way to visit Plaintiff |
37 | CASA report for Devonte Pippen |
38 | Why email sent to Kobe, Shaq, Magic lawyer Biggs 09192019 |
39 | Settlement email sent to Kobe, Shaq, Biggs 08/27/2019 |
40 | Shaq email "come to court" address response 09/15/20119 |