BEFORE YOU CAN JUDGE ME
LOOK IN THE MIRROR
THANKS FOR YOUR #RESPONSE
Friday, July 25, 2025
WHERE IS OBAMA??? DID YOU DROWN MALCOM JAMAL WARNER
JUST LIKE YOUR CHEF???
ANSWER ME BARRY SOTERO... EXPLAIN PLEASE
WARNING: BEWARE OF FENTANYL COCAINE IN VEGAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED UPDATE THEY JUST SET THIS ADDESS ON FIRE 🔥 🐦 😍 Repost 7/16/25)
IN
THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CHYVETTE A. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SCOTTIE PIPPEN, LARSA
PIPPEN, CARL T. PIPPEN, MELISSA PIPPEN, JASON GILLER, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Case No.: 2024L002166
Calendar: Judge Maire Aileen Dempsey
Courtroom: 2209
AMENDED
NOTICE OF APPEAL
- Plaintiff-Appellant, CHYVETTE A.
VALENTINE, respectfully appeals to the Illinois Appellate Court, First
Judicial District, from the Dismissal for Want of Prosecution (DWP)
entered on May 2, 2025, by Judge Kathy M. Flanagan, who was not the
assigned judge of record.
- The case remains assigned to Judge
Maire A. Dempsey in Courtroom 2209, where Plaintiff has consistently
complied with all scheduling orders.
- This appeal is brought pursuant to
Illinois Supreme Court Rules 301 and 303(a) and is based on the following
constitutional, procedural, and ethical violations:
3.1.
Improper dismissal without notice, motion, or hearing;
3.2. Unauthorized participation by unregistered counsel without filed
appearances, violating Illinois Supreme Court Rule 13(c);
3.3. Jurisdictional overreach by a judge not assigned to the case;
3.4. Retaliatory order striking all future court dates entered on June 16,
2025;
3.5. Active Motion for Default Judgment and Prove-Up of Damages was scheduled
for hearing on May 22, 2025;
3.6. Courtroom threats and intimidation documented by Plaintiff;
3.7. Denial of Zoom access to Plaintiff on June 2, 2025, further indicating
bias and exclusion.
FACTUAL
BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL POSTURE
- Service of Process:
4.1.
Scottie Pippen was personally served by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department on December 18, 2024.
4.2. Defendant Jason Giller acknowledged receipt via email on October 13, 2024,
confirming actual notice.
- Defendants' Default:
5.1.
No appearance, answer, or motion was filed by any Defendant.
5.2. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 181(a), default judgment was
procedurally proper.
- Jurisdictional Breach by Judge
Flanagan:
6.1.
On May 2, 2025, Judge Flanagan entered a DWP without notice, assignment, or
hearing.
6.2. This was not a scheduled hearing before the assigned judge, Judge Maire
Dempsey.
6.3. On June 2, 2025, Plaintiff was denied Zoom access to court—further
evidence of prejudice and bias.
- Pending Motions Ignored:
7.1.
An Amended Motion to Vacate the DWP was filed, asserting due process
violations.
7.2. An Amended Motion to Increase Damages to $350 Million was filed, supported
by the following new acts of harm on May 15, 2025:
7.2.1. Termination of employment;
7.2.2. Disconnection of utilities;
7.2.3. Continued harassment and intimidation.
LEGAL
ARGUMENT
- Default Judgment Was Legally
Appropriate
8.1.
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(d) and Supreme Court Rule 181, default is appropriate
when no appearance is entered.
8.2. See Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, 226 Ill. 2d 334 (2007);
8.3. See also Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Karbowski, 2014 IL App (1st)
130112.
- Judge Flanagan Acted Without
Jurisdiction
9.1.
As held in People ex rel. Reid v. Adkins, 48 Ill. App. 3d 598 (1st Dist.
1977), non-assigned judges lack authority to issue dispositive rulings.
9.2. The May 2, 2025 DWP is void ab initio.
9.3. This action violated U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Ill. Const. art. I, § 2.
- Due Process Requires Hearing on
Damages
10.1.
Plaintiff had a prove-up hearing scheduled for May 22, 2025 pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-604.
10.2. See Collins v. Roseland Comm. Hosp., 2017 IL App (1st) 160559.
- Motion to Vacate Was Timely and
Proper
11.1.
Filed under 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(e), the motion satisfies all legal criteria for
vacatur:
11.1.1.
Lack of notice;
11.1.2.
Unlawful judicial conduct;
11.1.3.
No attorney of record for Defendants.
- New Material Harm Warrants Increased
Damages
12.1.
See Bryson v. News Am. Publs., 174 Ill. 2d 77 (1996);
12.2. See Fellhauer v. City of Geneva, 142 Ill. 2d 495 (1991).
12.3. The conduct justifies punitive damages due to its malicious and
retaliatory nature.
JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT
- This complaint is filed under
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 63 (Canon 3) and alleges the following:
13.1.
Judge Flanagan was not assigned to the matter yet issued a dispositive ruling.
13.2. No Defendants appeared, and Plaintiff received no notice.
13.3. Court procedures were circumvented to issue an unauthorized DWP.
13.4. Plaintiff was prevented from appearing via Zoom on June 2, 2025.
13.5. Alleged judicial bias and external interference constitute misconduct.
- Plaintiff further alleges a pattern
of collusion and political interference, including actions by Defendant
Scottie Pippen:
14.1.
Exploiting political relationships to impair Plaintiff’s housing, employment,
legal access, and public credibility.
14.2. Targeting pastors, judges, employers, influencers, and law enforcement to
socially and financially isolate Plaintiff.
RELIEF
REQUESTED
- Plaintiff respectfully requests the
following relief:
15.1.
Reversal of the May 2, 2025 DWP and June 16, 2025 retaliatory order;
15.2. Reinstatement of the Complaint and hearing on all pending motions;
15.3. Declaration that the DWP is void ab initio;
15.4. Referral of Judge Flanagan’s conduct to the Judicial Inquiry Board;
15.5. Hearing or grant of Plaintiff’s $350 Million Amended Motion for Damages;
15.6. Independent investigation by the Judicial Inquiry Board into unauthorized
judicial conduct;
15.7. Public acknowledgment of violations and procedural safeguards;
15.8. Any additional relief deemed just and proper by this Court.
Respectfully
submitted,
/s/ Chyvette A. Valentine
Chyvette A. Valentine, Pro Se
PLEASE SHOW ME A NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE!!! The timeline goes from April 7, 2025 "Continuance" to May 2, 2025 "Dismissal" (repost 7/16/25)
IN
THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CHYVETTE A. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SCOTTIE PIPPEN, LARSA
PIPPEN, CARL T. PIPPEN, MELISSA PIPPEN, JASON GILLER, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Case No.: 2024L002166
Calendar: Judge Maire Aileen Dempsey
Courtroom: 2209
NOTICE OF APPEAL
- Plaintiff-Appellant, CHYVETTE A. VALENTINE, respectfully appeals to the Illinois Appellate Court, First Judicial District, from the Dismissal for Want of Prosecution (DWP) entered on May 2, 2025, by Judge Kathy M. Flanagan, who was not the assigned judge of record.
- The case remains assigned to Judge Maire A. Dempsey in Courtroom 2209, where Plaintiff has consistently complied with all scheduling orders.
- This appeal is brought pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rules 301 and 303(a) and is based on the following constitutional, procedural, and ethical violations:
3.1.
Improper dismissal without notice, motion, or hearing;
3.2. Unauthorized participation by unregistered counsel without filed
appearances, violating Illinois Supreme Court Rule 13(c);
3.3. Jurisdictional overreach by a judge not assigned to the case;
3.4. Retaliatory order striking all future court dates entered on June 16,
2025;
3.5. Active Motion for Default Judgment and Prove-Up of Damages was scheduled
for hearing on May 22, 2025;
3.6. Courtroom threats and intimidation documented by Plaintiff;
3.7. Denial of Zoom access to Plaintiff on June 2, 2025, further indicating
bias and exclusion.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL POSTURE
- Service of Process:
4.1.
Scottie Pippen was personally served by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department on December 18, 2024.
4.2. Defendant Jason Giller acknowledged receipt via email on October 13, 2024,
confirming actual notice.
- Defendants' Default:
5.1.
No appearance, answer, or motion was filed by any Defendant.
5.2. Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 181(a), default judgment was
procedurally proper.
- Jurisdictional Breach by Judge Flanagan:
6.1.
On May 2, 2025, Judge Flanagan entered a DWP without notice, assignment, or
hearing.
6.2. This was not a scheduled hearing before the assigned judge, Judge Maire
Dempsey.
6.3. On June 2, 2025, Plaintiff was denied Zoom access to court—further
evidence of prejudice and bias.
- Pending Motions Ignored:
7.1.
An Amended Motion to Vacate the DWP was filed, asserting due process
violations.
7.2. An Amended Motion to Increase Damages to $350 Million was filed, supported
by the following new acts of harm on May 15, 2025:
7.2.1. Termination of employment;
7.2.2. Disconnection of utilities;
7.2.3. Continued harassment and intimidation.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
- Default Judgment Was Legally Appropriate
8.1.
Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(d) and Supreme Court Rule 181, default is appropriate
when no appearance is entered.
8.2. See Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, 226 Ill. 2d 334 (2007);
8.3. See also Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Karbowski, 2014 IL App (1st)
130112.
- Judge Flanagan Acted Without Jurisdiction
9.1.
As held in People ex rel. Reid v. Adkins, 48 Ill. App. 3d 598 (1st Dist.
1977), non-assigned judges lack authority to issue dispositive rulings.
9.2. The May 2, 2025 DWP is void ab initio.
9.3. This action violated U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Ill. Const. art. I, § 2.
- Due Process Requires Hearing on Damages
10.1.
Plaintiff had a prove-up hearing scheduled for May 22, 2025 pursuant to 735
ILCS 5/2-604.
10.2. See Collins v. Roseland Comm. Hosp., 2017 IL App (1st) 160559.
- Motion to Vacate Was Timely and Proper
11.1.
Filed under 735 ILCS 5/2-1301(e), the motion satisfies all legal criteria for
vacatur:
11.1.1.
Lack of notice;
11.1.2.
Unlawful judicial conduct;
11.1.3.
No attorney of record for Defendants.
- New Material Harm Warrants Increased Damages
12.1.
See Bryson v. News Am. Publs., 174 Ill. 2d 77 (1996);
12.2. See Fellhauer v. City of Geneva, 142 Ill. 2d 495 (1991).
12.3. The conduct justifies punitive damages due to its malicious and
retaliatory nature.
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT
- This complaint is filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 63 (Canon 3) and alleges the following:
13.1.
Judge Flanagan was not assigned to the matter yet issued a dispositive ruling.
13.2. No Defendants appeared, and Plaintiff received no notice.
13.3. Court procedures were circumvented to issue an unauthorized DWP.
13.4. Plaintiff was prevented from appearing via Zoom on June 2, 2025.
13.5. Alleged judicial bias and external interference constitute misconduct.
- Plaintiff further alleges a pattern of collusion and political interference, including actions by Defendant Scottie Pippen:
14.1.
Exploiting political relationships to impair Plaintiff’s housing, employment,
legal access, and public credibility.
14.2. Targeting pastors, judges, employers, influencers, and law enforcement to
socially and financially isolate Plaintiff.
RELIEF REQUESTED
- Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief:
15.1.
Reversal of the May 2, 2025 DWP and June 16, 2025 retaliatory order;
15.2. Reinstatement of the Complaint and hearing on all pending motions;
15.3. Declaration that the DWP is void ab initio;
15.4. Referral of Judge Flanagan’s conduct to the Judicial Inquiry Board;
15.5. Hearing or grant of Plaintiff’s $350 Million Amended Motion for Damages;
15.6. Independent investigation by the Judicial Inquiry Board into unauthorized
judicial conduct;
15.7. Public acknowledgment of violations and procedural safeguards;
15.8. Any additional relief deemed just and proper by this Court.
Respectfully
submitted,
/s/ Chyvette A. Valentine
Chyvette A. Valentine, Pro Se
I arrived in Vegas on 7/19/2024 "She" chased right along 7/24/24 #Evidence #Stalking
Vegas knows the entire history (repost 3/28/25)
In Illinois, conspiracy to commit murder, like other conspiracies, requires proof of an agreement to commit the offense, intent to commit it, and an act in furtherance of the agreement, and carries a Class 1 felony sentence.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Elements of Conspiracy:
To be convicted of conspiracy to commit murder in Illinois, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
Agreement: The defendant agreed with another person to commit the offense of murder.
Intent: The defendant intended that the offense of murder be committed.
Act in Furtherance: An act in furtherance of the agreement was committed by the defendant or a co-conspirator.
Solicitation of Murder:
A person commits solicitation of murder when, with the intent that the offense of first-degree murder be committed, they command, encourage, or request another to commit that offense.
Sentence:
Conspiracy to commit murder is a Class 1 felony, which carries a penalty of 4 to 15 years in prison.
First-Degree Murder:
Illinois law defines first-degree murder as when a person intends to kill, intends to inflict great bodily harm, or knowingly engages in an act that has a strong probability of death or great bodily harm for another individual, causing a person's death.
Case Law:
The Illinois Supreme Court case People v. Hopp (209 Ill. 2d 1, 805 N.E.2d 1190 (2004)) outlines the elements of conspiracy, including the requirement of intent to kill.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
ARCHIVES
Click to Search