Formation

Impact-Site-Verification: -1074777364

Saturday, November 15, 2025

**SETTLEMENT OFFER WITHOUT PREJUDICE & FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY**


Hilton Grand Vacations
Attn: Legal Department / Team Member Relations
5555 Badura Avenue, Suite 160
Las Vegas, NV 89118

Pleshette Roberts-Robinson
8057 Windmill Villa Street
Las Vegas, NV 89139

From:
Chyvette A. Valentine
P.O. Box 93832
Las Vegas, NV 89199

Bcc: Media from Pippen Case 2024L002166

To Whom It May Concern:

This letter serves as a formal settlement offer regarding the claims arising from my employment at Hilton Grand Vacations (HGV) located at 5555 Badura Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89118, and the conduct of Pleshette Roberts-Robinson, which resulted in defamation, harassment, coercion, emotional distress, and retaliatory termination.

Based on a comprehensive review of the facts, documented evidence, and the applicable Nevada statutes and case law, I am seriously considering filing an amended action in District Court, which allows for substantially higher damages, including punitive damages and attorney fees.

However, before proceeding with escalated litigation, I am extending this opportunity for voluntary settlement.

I. PRIMARY LEGAL CLAIMS 

1. DEFAMATION & SLANDER (Roberts-Robinson)

  1. False statement of fact

  2. Publication to third party

  3. Fault (negligence or disregard for truth)

  4. Damages

Nevada Law Supporting Liability:

• Pope v. Motel 6, 121 Nev. 307 (2005) – False statements harming employment reputation are actionable.
• Bull v. McCuskey, 96 Nev. 706 (1980) – Publication to third parties establishes defamation.
• NRS 200.510 – Criminal slander statute; supports civil liability.

Evidence includes:

• False statements that Plaintiff was “HIV-positive.”
• False allegations that Plaintiff harassed or stalked her.
• False statements communicated to co-workers, supervisors, and external third parties including individuals outside HGV.

This constitutes defamation per se, meaning damages are presumed.

2. RETALIATION – NRS 613.340 (Against HGV)

Retaliation requires:

  1. Protected activity (harassment complaint to HR)

  2. Adverse action (termination)

  3. Causal connection (temporal proximity)

Proven Timeline:

• August 18, 2025 – Formal HR complaint filed.
• September 30, 2025 – Terminated.
• 43 days between complaint and termination.
• Termination was based solely on a complaint from the person I reported.

Nevada Case Law:

• Sands Regent v. Valgardson, 105 Nev. 436 (1989) – Failure to address harassment creates liability.
• Dillard Dept. Stores v. Beckwith, 115 Nev. 372 (1999) – Close timing supports retaliation.

This claim alone could justify tens of thousands in District Court.

3. HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT (HGV & Roberts-Robinson)

Nevada & Federal Support:

• NRS 613.330 – Unlawful employment practices.
• Seng v. State, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 19 (2015) – Nevada adopts Title VII hostile environment standards.
• Little v. Windermere, 301 F.3d 958 (9th Cir.) – Employer liable when failing to remedy harassment.

Supporting Facts:

• Sexual discussions and inappropriate propositions.
• Aggressive behavior on the call floor.
• Continuous harassment and text messages.
• Failure to separate Plaintiff from aggressor despite repeated HR reports.

4. COERCION – NRS 200.550 (Roberts-Robinson)

Coercion includes threats, intimidation, or actions intended to compel or prevent lawful behavior.

Evidence:

• Threats to file false HR reports.
• Harassing Plaintiff during medical emergency.
• Attempting to intimidate Plaintiff into silence.

5. NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION – HGV

• Barmettler v. Reno Air, 114 Nev. 441 (1998) – Employers liable for failure to supervise known risks.

HGV:
• Failed to address multiple documented complaints.
• Assigned an unstable employee as a “training buddy.”
• Allowed ongoing harassment and violations.
• Terminated Plaintiff rather than address wrongdoing.

6. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (Roberts-Robinson)

Nevada requires:
• Extreme and outrageous conduct
• Intent or reckless disregard
• Emotional distress actually suffered

Roberts-Robinson’s behavior especially during medical emergency meets the standard.

II. SETTLEMENT DEMAND

To avoid District Court escalation, media exposure, and potential attorney fees, I extend the following settlement terms:

Settlement Amount:

$10,000 payable jointly by:

  1. Hilton Grand Vacations

  2. Pleshette Roberts-Robinson

Plus:

• Reimbursement of documented medical-related expenses
• Removal of negative employment references
• A neutral reference letter from HGV
• Mutual non-disparagement agreement
• Closure of all claims upon payment

III. DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE

Please respond within 10 business days of receipt of this letter.
If no agreement is reached, I will proceed with:

✔ Filing a District Court Complaint
✔ Claims including retaliation, defamation per se, negligent supervision, hostile work environment, and coercion
✔ Disclosure of all text messages, evidence, and medical documentation
✔ Inclusion of punitive damages and attorney fee requests

This offer is made in good faith and with the intent to resolve this matter efficiently for all parties.